timsaucer commented on PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#issuecomment-2721032760
I am testing my updated consolidated code now. When running on a 10 GB scale
factor TPC-H query, I get comparable times for both q1 and q2, which take 10
and 53 s on my m4 pr
timsaucer commented on PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#issuecomment-2719319267
Still needs careful testing and performance evaluation, but trying to pull
in methods for this issue, #1041 and #1015 into a single PR
--
This is an automated message from
kevinjqliu commented on code in PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#discussion_r1979772203
##
src/dataframe.rs:
##
@@ -100,46 +106,153 @@ impl PyDataFrame {
}
fn _repr_html_(&self, py: Python) -> PyDataFusionResult {
-let mut
timsaucer commented on PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#issuecomment-2692325079
I need to update the unit test. I don't think the just validating it hasn't
changed is exactly what we need, so I may think about it some more.
--
This is an automated mess
timsaucer opened a new pull request, #1036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036
# Which issue does this PR close?
None.
# Rationale for this change
The notebook rendering of DataFrames is very useful, but it can be enhanced.
This PR adds quality o
