Re: [PR] Revert "fix: create file for empty stream" [datafusion]

2025-07-08 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #16682: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16682#issuecomment-3050188171 > @alamb @brunal sorry for inconvenience, revert it is ok. I'm trying to find a new way to implement this feature. Thank you @brunal and @chenkovsky -- This is an automated m

Re: [PR] Revert "fix: create file for empty stream" [datafusion]

2025-07-08 Thread via GitHub
alamb merged PR #16682: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16682 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi

Re: [PR] Revert "fix: create file for empty stream" [datafusion]

2025-07-08 Thread via GitHub
chenkovsky commented on PR #16682: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16682#issuecomment-3049753756 @alamb @brunal sorry for inconvenience, revert it is ok. I'm trying to find a new way to implement this feature. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [PR] Revert "fix: create file for empty stream" [datafusion]

2025-07-07 Thread via GitHub
brunal commented on PR #16682: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16682#issuecomment-3047584092 Apologies for that; it's now fixed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [PR] Revert "fix: create file for empty stream" [datafusion]

2025-07-07 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #16682: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16682#issuecomment-3046616782 The CI tests seem to have some problems unfortunately -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL a

Re: [PR] Revert "fix: create file for empty stream" [datafusion]

2025-07-07 Thread via GitHub
brunal commented on PR #16682: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16682#issuecomment-3046224891 Indeed! I have just updated the revert commit with this test. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use

Re: [PR] Revert "fix: create file for empty stream" [datafusion]

2025-07-07 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #16682: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16682#issuecomment-3044670474 Looks like there may be a test in https://github.com/brunal/datafusion/commit/aed5316583ecae7901d9596039ca4bfe7cd48811 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser

[PR] Revert "fix: create file for empty stream" [datafusion]

2025-07-04 Thread via GitHub
brunal opened a new pull request, #16682: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16682 Reverts apache/datafusion#16342 After that change, one cannot write an empty RecordBatch with a schema to parquet anymore. Indeed, the logic added tries to write an empty recordbatch