Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

Omega359 commented on code in PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1987631033 ## content/blog/2025-03-05-ordering-analysis.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@ +--- +layout: post +title: Analysis of Ordering for Better Plans +date: 2025-03-05 +author: M

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

Omega359 commented on code in PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1987634924 ## content/blog/2025-03-05-ordering-analysis.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@ +--- +layout: post +title: Analysis of Ordering for Better Plans +date: 2025-03-05 +author: M

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

akurmustafa commented on code in PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1987710785 ## content/blog/2025-03-05-ordering-analysis.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@ +--- +layout: post +title: Analysis of Ordering for Better Plans +date: 2025-03-05 +author

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

Omega359 commented on code in PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1987635861 ## content/blog/2025-03-05-ordering-analysis.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@ +--- +layout: post +title: Analysis of Ordering for Better Plans +date: 2025-03-05 +author: M

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

akurmustafa commented on code in PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1987767954 ## content/blog/2025-03-05-ordering-analysis.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@ +--- +layout: post +title: Analysis of Ordering for Better Plans +date: 2025-03-05 +author

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

alamb commented on PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#issuecomment-2710581497 Giving it another read now -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific c

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

akurmustafa commented on PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#issuecomment-2708620029 Hi @alamb, I have addressed the points you mention. I also changed the order of some sections to make the post more clear. I am happy to address reviews by the community. -- Th

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

akurmustafa commented on code in PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1986190590 ## content/blog/2025-03-05-ordering-analysis.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +--- +layout: post +title: Analysis of Ordering for Better Plans +date: 2025-03-05 +author

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

alamb commented on code in PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#discussion_r1983788745 ## content/blog/2025-03-05-ordering-analysis.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +--- +layout: post +title: Analysis of Ordering for Better Plans +date: 2025-03-05 +author: Must

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

akurmustafa commented on PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#issuecomment-2704649092 Thanks @alamb for your feedback as always. I will try to adress those points. Please feel free to add additional feedback as we revise through this work. I am happy to address the

Re: [PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

alamb commented on PR #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58#issuecomment-2704337697 I will review this later today -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specif

[PR] Order Requirement Analysis [datafusion-site]

akurmustafa opened a new pull request, #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58 As per the [discussion](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14836#issuecomment-2702045671). I am moving some of my previous blog posts to the `Datafusion` website. Please feel free to