LiaCastaneda commented on code in PR #15580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15580#discussion_r2031002407
##
datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs:
##
@@ -2061,6 +2066,35 @@ fn tuple_err(value: (Result, Result)) ->
Result<(T, R)> {
}
}
+// Handle the ca
berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #15580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15580#discussion_r2030998452
##
datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs:
##
@@ -2061,6 +2066,35 @@ fn tuple_err(value: (Result, Result)) ->
Result<(T, R)> {
}
}
+// Handle the c
LiaCastaneda commented on code in PR #15580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15580#discussion_r2030945282
##
datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs:
##
@@ -2061,6 +2066,35 @@ fn tuple_err(value: (Result, Result)) ->
Result<(T, R)> {
}
}
+// Handle the ca
LiaCastaneda commented on code in PR #15580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15580#discussion_r2030945282
##
datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs:
##
@@ -2061,6 +2066,35 @@ fn tuple_err(value: (Result, Result)) ->
Result<(T, R)> {
}
}
+// Handle the ca
LiaCastaneda commented on PR #15580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15580#issuecomment-2779448611
Related PRs:
- #10088 - adds the check, the workaround for aggregate was changing the
physical name with `create_function_physical_name`, before there was also
`physical_name
LiaCastaneda commented on code in PR #15580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15580#discussion_r2029242588
##
datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs:
##
@@ -2061,6 +2066,36 @@ fn tuple_err(value: (Result, Result)) ->
Result<(T, R)> {
}
}
+// Handle the ca
LiaCastaneda opened a new pull request, #15580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15580
## Which issue does this PR close?
related to #15439
## Rationale for this change
We want to keep the names mismatch check
## What changes are included in this
