Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
qstommyshu commented on PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019#issuecomment-2899443238 > Thank you @qstommyshu for all the help getting this PR to a good state You’re welcome! I'm happy to help! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on code in PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019#discussion_r2100968491 ## datafusion/sql/tests/sql_integration.rs: ## @@ -4650,7 +4650,7 @@ fn test_prepare_statement_infer_types_from_join() { assert_snapshot!( plan,

Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
alamb merged PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi

Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019#issuecomment-2898938075 Thank you @qstommyshu for all the help getting this PR to a good state -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
brayanjuls commented on PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019#issuecomment-2896583479 @qstommyshu @alamb let me know if there are any additional changes you need me to add to this PR, I think it should be ready. -- This is an automated message from the Apache G

Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-12 Thread via GitHub
qstommyshu commented on code in PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019#discussion_r2085769121 ## datafusion/sql/src/statement.rs: ## @@ -710,6 +710,17 @@ impl SqlToRel<'_, S> { *statement, &mut planner_context,

Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-12 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on code in PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019#discussion_r2085180878 ## datafusion/sql/src/statement.rs: ## @@ -710,6 +710,15 @@ impl SqlToRel<'_, S> { *statement, &mut planner_context,

Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-12 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on code in PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019#discussion_r2085171533 ## datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/prepare.slt: ## @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ DEALLOCATE my_plan statement ok PREPARE my_plan AS SELECT * FROM person WHERE id < $1; -s

Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-11 Thread via GitHub
brayanjuls commented on code in PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019#discussion_r2083769931 ## datafusion/sql/src/statement.rs: ## @@ -710,6 +710,17 @@ impl SqlToRel<'_, S> { *statement, &mut planner_context,

Re: [PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-11 Thread via GitHub
qstommyshu commented on code in PR #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019#discussion_r2083691801 ## datafusion/sql/src/statement.rs: ## @@ -710,6 +710,17 @@ impl SqlToRel<'_, S> { *statement, &mut planner_context,

[PR] Include data types in logical plans of inferred prepare statements [datafusion]

2025-05-10 Thread via GitHub
brayanjuls opened a new pull request, #16019: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16019 ## Which issue does this PR close? Closes #16018 ## Rationale for this change As data types of prepare statement without explicit types declaration are not included in the