Re: [PR] Add design process section to the docs [datafusion]

2025-06-16 Thread via GitHub
comphead merged PR #16397: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf

Re: [PR] Add design process section to the docs [datafusion]

2025-06-16 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on code in PR #16397: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397#discussion_r2149689081 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md: ## @@ -108,6 +108,26 @@ Features above) prior to acceptance include: [extensions list]: ../library-user-guide/extensions.

Re: [PR] Add design process section to the docs [datafusion]

2025-06-14 Thread via GitHub
comphead commented on code in PR #16397: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397#discussion_r2147429880 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md: ## @@ -108,6 +108,26 @@ Features above) prior to acceptance include: [extensions list]: ../library-user-guide/extensio

Re: [PR] Add design process section to the docs [datafusion]

2025-06-14 Thread via GitHub
comphead commented on code in PR #16397: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397#discussion_r2147429475 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md: ## @@ -108,6 +108,26 @@ Features above) prior to acceptance include: [extensions list]: ../library-user-guide/extensio

Re: [PR] Add design process section to the docs [datafusion]

2025-06-13 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #16397: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397#issuecomment-2971466770 > Relevant question to this text and the project is what the project's stance is wrt API stability? Merging fast means you're likely to ship something a little bit too quickly every no

Re: [PR] Add design process section to the docs [datafusion]

2025-06-13 Thread via GitHub
pepijnve commented on PR #16397: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397#issuecomment-2971445102 Sorry to go a bit off topic for a sec, but there's some context I would like to add. I worked on API design of a commercial software library with tons of extension points for 10+ ye

Re: [PR] Add design process section to the docs [datafusion]

2025-06-13 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #16397: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397#issuecomment-2971392100 > This is really nice, thanks @alamb! Thanks -- I was just channeling @ozankabak :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, ple

Re: [PR] Add design process section to the docs [datafusion]

2025-06-13 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on code in PR #16397: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397#discussion_r2145138376 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md: ## @@ -108,6 +108,26 @@ Features above) prior to acceptance include: [extensions list]: ../library-user-guide/extensions.

[PR] Add design process section to the docs [datafusion]

2025-06-13 Thread via GitHub
alamb opened a new pull request, #16397: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397 ## Which issue does this PR close? - part of #7013 ## Rationale for this change While discussing a design for cancellation with @pepijnve and @zhuqi-lucas and myself, @ozankab