alamb merged PR #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusio
Omega359 commented on code in PR #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59#discussion_r2002097220
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -291,6 +291,53 @@ Following third and fourth constraints for the simplified
table, the succinct va
`[time_
akurmustafa commented on PR #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59#issuecomment-2734727273
> Thanks @akurmustafa
>
> I noticed some small format issues when reviewing this so I pushed
[e10c17f](https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/commit/e10c17f0f99b83d8e15cd
Omega359 commented on code in PR #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59#discussion_r2002096546
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -291,6 +291,53 @@ Following third and fourth constraints for the simplified
table, the succinct va
`[time_
alamb commented on PR #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59#issuecomment-2734731781
> Thanks @alamb, I was working on to add the example you gave ("DataFusion
can find / use orderings based on query intermediates"). Should we add this to
the document what do you think?
akurmustafa commented on PR #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59#issuecomment-2734859868
With the
[commit](https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59/commits/85eea6a572f95972a155ee9926319112e7149ce8),
I have added the @alamb's suggestion to the post.
--
This
Omega359 commented on code in PR #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59#discussion_r2002099018
##
content/images/ordering_analysis/query_window_plan.png:
##
Review Comment:
At the output of the window function the table has the ordering:
--
This is
akurmustafa commented on PR #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59#issuecomment-2734756045
> > Thanks @alamb, I was working on to add the example you gave ("DataFusion
can find / use orderings based on query intermediates"). Should we add this to
the document what do yo
alamb commented on code in PR #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59#discussion_r1998872033
##
content/blog/2025-03-11-ordering-analysis.md:
##
@@ -291,6 +291,31 @@ Following third and fourth constraints for the simplified
table, the succinct va
`[time_bin
akurmustafa opened a new pull request, #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/59
@alamb and I added a blog post recently with the
[PR](https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/58).
We later thought that mentioning WITH ORDER API (which species orderings at
the
10 matches
Mail list logo
