goldmedal commented on issue #1619:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1619#issuecomment-2564364957
> Do we need to make a patch release for sqlparser 53.0.0?
>
I think we don't need to do it.
>By my reading this is an issue that was introduced after
alamb commented on issue #1619:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1619#issuecomment-2564362812
Thanks @goldmedal and @iffyio
Do we need to make a patch release for sqlparser 53.0.0?
By my reading this is an issue that was introduced after that rel
iffyio closed issue #1619: Wrong result for parsing special double number value
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1619
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
goldmedal commented on issue #1619:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1619#issuecomment-2562873092
After some tests, I believe this syntax is broken by #1600 and #1598
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
goldmedal commented on issue #1619:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1619#issuecomment-2562282248
I'll take a look at this issue soon.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
U
goldmedal opened a new issue, #1619:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1619
# Description
I tried to use the nightly commit in the upstream DataFusion (nightly
commit) and the tests failed.
- https://github.com/goldmedal/datafusion/pull/2
I think it's
