pepijnve commented on issue #16193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16193#issuecomment-2915032807
I'll change the title to be less broad and focus on cancelling aggregations
instead.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
alamb commented on issue #16193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16193#issuecomment-2914274753
> [@alamb](https://github.com/alamb) how are you guys handling general
housekeeping in the issue tracker? Should I close this issue since it's a
specific example of [#15314](https
pepijnve commented on issue #16193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16193#issuecomment-2913983580
@alamb how are you guys handling general housekeeping in the issue tracker?
Should I close this issue since it's a specific example of #15314?
--
This is an automated message
pepijnve commented on issue #16193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16193#issuecomment-2913693236
Yes this is more or less the same issue. PR #14028 proposed adding a yield
point at the leaf of the plan when moving from one file to the next. This PR
adds yield points closer
alamb commented on issue #16193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16193#issuecomment-2913495619
I believe this sounds similar to from this PR from @jeffreyssmith2nd
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14036
@carols10cents has made a benchmark here:
- h
zhuqi-lucas commented on issue #16193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16193#issuecomment-2912804691
Submitted the PR https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16193
The PR is limited to solve aggregate with no group streaming, we can extend
to more cases if it's no
zhuqi-lucas commented on issue #16193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16193#issuecomment-2912756722
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
pepijnve opened a new issue, #16193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16193
### Describe the bug
Canceling queries is done by dropping the corresponding `RecordBatchStream`.
This can be done using tokio's `switch!` macro as can be seen in the CLI
application's handlin
