Re: [PATCH] git-send-email: Cc more people

2018-04-18 Thread Steven Rostedt
ewed-by: or ... many other > tags that would seem (to us) to indicate that person might be interested. > This patch to git-send-email tries to pick up all Foo-by: tags. Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Note, this is one of the reasons I still use quilt to send my email. I've modified my q

Re: Should "git apply --check" imply verbose?

2013-08-20 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:07:18 -0700 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Paul Gortmaker writes: > > > OK, so given your feedback, how do you feel about a patch to the > > documentation that indicates to use "-v" in combination with the > > "--check" to get equivalent "patch --dry-run" behaviour? If that >

Re: Should "git apply --check" imply verbose?

2013-08-20 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:45:03 -0700 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Steven Rostedt writes: > > >> I do not think it is necessarily a good idea to assume that people > >> who are learning "git apply" know how GNU patch works. > > > > Linus told me that &qu

Re: Should "git apply --check" imply verbose?

2013-08-20 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:43:56 -0700 Junio C Hamano wrote: > But only folks in the kernel circle will be told by Linus the > similarity between apply and patch, no? Well, there was a time when Linus was making his rounds showcasing git more than Linux, to people that were not kernel developers.

Re: email as a bona fide git transport

2019-10-17 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:01:33 +0200 Vegard Nossum wrote: > In your example, couldn't Darrick simply base his xfs work on the latest > xfs branch that was pulled by Linus? That should be up to date with all > things xfs without having any of the things that made Linus's tree not > work for him. Su