On 01/22/2013 05:14 PM, Thomas Rast wrote:
Eric Chamberland writes:
So, hum, do we have some sort of conclusion?
Shall it be a fix for git to get around that lustre "behavior"?
If something can be done in git it would be great: it is a *lot*
easier to change git than the lustre filesystem so
[I forgot to subscribe to the git mailing list, sorry for that]
On 01/22/2013 05:14 PM, Thomas Rast wrote:
Eric Chamberland writes:
So, hum, do we have some sort of conclusion?
Shall it be a fix for git to get around that lustre "behavior"?
If something can be done in git it would be great:
Hello,
Here is a patch (with git format-patch) that removes any timer if NO_SETITIMER
is set.
Éric:
To test it with your workflow:
$ module load apps/git/1.8.1.1.348.g78eb407-NO_SETITIMER-patch
$ git clone ...
Sébastien
On 01/22/2013 05:14 PM, Thomas Rast w
MER:
$ objdump -d ./git|grep setitimer|wc -l
0
$ objdump -d ./git|grep alarm|wc -l
0
Timers without NO_SETITIMER:
$ objdump -d /software/apps/git/1.8.1/bin/git|grep setitimer|wc -l
5
$ objdump -d /software/apps/git/1.8.1/bin/git|grep alarm|wc -l
0
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Boisvert
---
bui
4 matches
Mail list logo