On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
Hi Duy,
> This series builds on top of the index-helper series I just sent and
> uses watchman to keep track of file changes in order to avoid lstat()
> at refresh time. The series can also be found at [1]
>
> When I started this work,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> It was from last year. I may have measured it but because I didn't
>> save it in the commit message, it was lost anyway. Installing watchman
>> and measuring with webkit.git soon..
>
> Test repo: webkit.git with 104665 tracked files, 5615 untra
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> "brian m. carlson" writes:
>>
>> Thanks. I personally prefer the plain-text original, but I do
>> understand the need to have a version with ids that you can tell
>> others to vi
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Johannes Schindelin
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wr
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:25 AM, David Turner wrote:
>
> My patches are not the world's most beautiful, but they do work.
Out of curiosity: do you run the patches at twitter?
Thanks.
-- Paolo
--
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
>
> Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Michael Haggerty
> > wrote:
> >
> > While I agree with you the this project is managed in a bit conservative
> > way
>
> Only a
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> But that being said, this is Felipe's code. While we have a legal right
> to distribute it in v2.0, if he would really prefer it out for v2.0, I
> would respect that.
My understanding is that Felipe would prefer to keep it _in_ the git.git
repo
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
>
> This is not my first patch that gets rejected, but it's the first one
> that gets rejected by Junio without even looking at it. What is
> anybody supposed to think about that?
My very humble opinion: submit again the series without inc
8 matches
Mail list logo