Should "git log --decorate" indicate whether the HEAD is detached?

2015-02-16 Thread Julien Cretel
As of Git 2.3.0, the output of "git log --decorate" is ambiguous as to whether the HEAD is detached or not. More specifically, consider the following output of "git log --decorate": 4d860e9 (HEAD, master, dev) Remove trailing whitespace Whether the HEAD is attached to master or detached, the

Re: Should "git log --decorate" indicate whether the HEAD is detached?

2015-02-16 Thread Julien Cretel
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Julien Cretel writes: > >> As of Git 2.3.0, the output of "git log --decorate" is ambiguous as to >> whether the HEAD is detached or not. > > It sounds as if you are reporting some regression, but has any

Re: Should "git log --decorate" indicate whether the HEAD is detached?

2015-02-19 Thread Julien Cretel
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Julien's "HEAD=master, other" vs "HEAD, master, other" may be > subdued enough to be undistracting, I would guess. I do not think > the distinction between "HEAD = master" and "HEAD -> master" would > be useful, on the other hand. Just to

Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] log decorations for HEAD

2015-03-23 Thread Julien Cretel
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > So it didn't take too long to convince me after all :) > > Here comes Junio's version, preceded by a cleanup of the color > setting and resetting for decorations. > > Junio C Hamano (1): > log: decorate HEAD with branch name > > Michae