> It's almost like the compiler is getting the initializer wrong. It's a
> long shot, but I wonder if the presence of the bitfield could be
> triggering a compiler bug (or there is a subtle C rule about bitfield
> initializations that I do not know). Just for the sake of my sanity,
> what does the
>
[snip]
> Good point. Unfortunately, I can't get either yours or mine to fail,
> neither with a recent version of gcc nor with gcc-4.1. But I can't
> convince git to fail, either. The only gcc-4.1 I have is Debian's
> 4.1.3 release, which is not quite what the OP has.
>
> > Or perhaps somethin
2 matches
Mail list logo
