On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 17:08 -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 06:02:59AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> FWIW, I can't replicate the problem on either "master" or "pu". I wonder
> why.
>
Neither can I. I tried running t5601 on "master" and on "pu" after
reverting the patch found
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff King
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 6:13 PM
> To: Joris Valette
> Cc: Andreas Schwab; Jason Pyeron; git@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Consider escaping special characters like 'less' does
>
>
> I.e., something like this would probably help your case
Heads up, I'm gonna play the devil's advocate a little, here.
On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 15:56 +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
> No that is not up to the hash function. First because hashes are too
> long to be manipulated by humans, and second no hash will ever
> capture human intent. You ne
--
Hello,
I am writing you this email to solicit your co-operation and
partnership in a business that would benefit us immensely.
I would like to name you the beneficiary to my late client's fund who
died along with his next-of-kin during a summer vacation in the Middle
East.
I shall of
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 13:45 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
> The git-test from Michael sounds intriguing. Initially I put off using
> it as I had my main working dir (or rather test dir) on a spinning
> disk, still. Now I test in memory only, which is a lot faster, so I could
> try if git-test can
On 10/21, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 07:33:03PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/git-stash.sh b/git-stash.sh
> > index 8b2ce9afda..16919277ba 100755
> > --- a/git-stash.sh
> > +++ b/git-stash.sh
> > @@ -267,11 +267,11 @@ push_stash () {
> > # tra
On 10/21, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 07:33:04PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> > 'git stash push' fixes a historical wart in the interface of 'git stash
> > save'. As 'git stash push' has all functionality of 'git stash save',
> > with a nicer, more consistent user interface de
Thanks Peff for the review of the previous rounds.
In addition to addressing the review comments, this round adds another
patch getting rid of the extra help with an unknown option to git
stash push.
Interdiff below:
diff --git a/Documentation/git-stash.txt b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
index 89
git stash push is the newer interface for creating a stash. While we
are still keeping git stash save around for the time being, it's better
to point new users of git stash to the more modern (and more feature
rich) interface, instead of teaching them the older version that we
might want to phase
With the 'git stash save' interface, it was easily possible for users to
try to add a message which would start with "-", which 'git stash save'
would interpret as a command line argument, and fail. For this case we
added some extra help on how to create a stash with a message starting
with "-".
'git stash push' fixes a historical wart in the interface of 'git stash
save'. As 'git stash push' has all functionality of 'git stash save',
with a nicer, more consistent user interface deprecate 'git stash
save'. To do this, remove it from the synopsis of the man page, and
move it to a separate
Claim Donation
Hi all,
I was recently left with an interesting problem of looking at a heuristic to
determine how much original code was left in a repository. Or to put another
way, how much the code had changed since. In my case "original code" means
"since the initial commit", as this code base had been impo
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 07:54:57PM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 13:45 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> >
> > The git-test from Michael sounds intriguing. Initially I put off using
> > it as I had my main working dir (or rather test dir) on a spinning
> > disk, still. Now I
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 06:04:06PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Thanks Peff for the review of the previous rounds.
>
> In addition to addressing the review comments, this round adds another
> patch getting rid of the extra help with an unknown option to git
> stash push.
Yeah, the reasoning i
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 08:27:20AM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > ESC (for color)
> > + if ($line =~ s/[\000-\011\013-\032\034-\037]/?/g) {
>
> What about CR [0x0D] ?
I assumed that CR was one of the things we'd want to avoid (and it was
in fact what I used to test this). E.g.,
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> Interdiff below:
Thanks. Looks much more polished.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-stash.txt b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> index 89b6a0e672..8be661007d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> @@ -86,7 +86,9 @@ The `--patch
Overall the result looks reasonable and get us closer to the ideal
world where nobody recalls "stash save" has ever existed ;-)
Will queue; thanks.
Thomas Adam writes:
> What I did was first of all ascertain the number of original lines in each of
> the files I was interested in:
>
> for i in *.[ch]
> do
> c="$(git --no-pager blame "$i" | grep -c '^\^')"
> [ $c -gt 0 ] && echo "$i:$c"
> done | so
Jameson Miller writes:
> Teach the status command more flexibility in how ignored files are
> reported. Currently, the reporting of ignored files and untracked
> files are linked. You cannot control how ignored files are reported
> independently of how untracked files are reported (i.e. `all` vs
Jameson Miller writes:
> Jameson Miller (4):
> status: add option to show ignored files differently
> status: report matching ignored and normal untracked
> status: document options to show matching ignored files
> status: test --ignored=matching
Thanks, queued.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:19:38AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > - This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'.
> > + This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'. It
> > + differs from "stash push" in that it cannot take pathspecs,
> > + and any non-option argum
The latest maintenance release Git v2.14.3 is now available at
the usual places.
The tarballs are found at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/
The following public repositories all have a copy of the 'v2.14.3'
tag and the 'maint' branch that the tag points at:
url = https://kern
Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:19:38AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > - This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'.
>> > + This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'. It
>> > + differs from "stash push" in that it cannot take pathspecs,
>> > + a
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
> > Interdiff below:
>
> Thanks. Looks much more polished.
>
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-stash.txt b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> > index 89b6a0e672..8be661007d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> > +++
26 matches
Mail list logo
