Add a test for the case when only one parameter is passed to '-m'
(move/rename) option.
For example - if 'git branch -m bbb' is run, it should rename the
currently checked out branch to bbb. There was no test for this
particular case with only one parameter for -m option. However,
there's one simi
Hi,
As it looks like something easy enough for a beginner, I though I could
give it a try. Here is what it looks like. If it's good enough, I'll
add a few lines to document 'status.showStash' and send a patch.
There is one thing I've noticed though. When using 'git stash pop', it
shows the the n
Am 07.06.2017 um 10:17 schrieb Jeff King:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 12:40:34PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
Duplicates strbuf_expand to a certain extent, but not too badly, I
think. Leaves the door open for letting strftime handle the local
case.
I guess you'd plan to do that like this in the cal
I haven't seen any response. Would it be possible for anyone to review?
Thanks,
Joel
On 6/7/2017 5:55 PM, Joel Teichroeb wrote:
I've rewritten git stash as a builtin c command. All tests pass,
and I've added two new tests. Test coverage is around 95% with the
only things missing coverage being
On June 11, 2017 1:07 PM liam Beguin wrote:
>There is one thing I've noticed though. When using 'git stash pop', it shows
>the the number of stashes before dropping the commit and I'm not quite ?>sure
>how to address this.
On 10/06/17 06:22 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 06:12:28
Hi Randall,
On 11/06/2017 19:57, Randall S. Becker wrote:
> Random thought: what if a stash id could be used in the same way as
> any other ref, so diff stash[0] stash[1] would be possible -
> although I can see this being problematic for a merge or rebase.
Not sure if I`m misunderstanding you,
On June 11, 2017 2:19 PM Igor Djordjevic wrote:
>On 11/06/2017 19:57, Randall S. Becker wrote:
>> Random thought: what if a stash id could be used in the same way as
>> any other ref, so diff stash[0] stash[1] would be possible - although
>> I can see this being problematic for a merge or rebas
On 06/07, Joel Teichroeb wrote:
> Implement all git stash functionality as a builtin command
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Teichroeb
> ---
Thanks for working on this. A few comments from me below. Mainly on
stash push, as that's what I'm most familiar with, and all I had time
for today. Hope it hel
In a custom pretty format, using the '+' or ' ' combinators to prefix
a non-empty expansion with whitespace will erroneously truncate
subsequent expansions of the same type.
Normally '%+X' inserts a newline before , IFF the expansion of X is
non-empty:
$ git log -n 1 --pretty='format:newline:
On 18-05-17, 17:05, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This adds tocmd option to suppress-cc command which already supports
> cccmd and others.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> ---
> Documentation/git-send-email.txt | 1 +
> git-send-email.perl | 8
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+),
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 05:40:34PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
>
>> Before I get into the details, I have some questions:
>>
>> 1. I am concerned that "struct repository" will end up growing without
>> bounds as we store more and more repo-specifi
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> In an ideal world the user do:
>>
>> git submodule add git://host/repo.git path
>>
>> which adds the gitlink and the .gitmodules entry. But it doesn't seem
>> unreasonable for somebody unfamiliar with submodules to d
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> Similar functions exist in apply.c and builtin/show-branch.c for
> counting the number of slashes in a string. Also in the later
> patches, we introduce a third caller for the same. Hence, we unify
> it now by cleaning the existing functi
13 matches
Mail list logo
