Re: [PATCH v2] Bump core.deltaBaseCacheLimit to 128MiB

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > David Kastrup writes: > >> Junio C Hamano writes: >> >>> David Kastrup writes: >>> The default of 16MiB causes serious thrashing for large delta chains combined with large files. Signed-off-by: David Kastrup ---

[PATCH] builtin/apply.c: fuzzy_matchlines:trying to fix some inefficiencies

Hi fellows, I'm planning on applying on GSOC 2014... I tried my luck with that kinda weird microproject about inefficiencies, and I think I've discovered some. (also on a totally different mood, there are some warning about empty format strings during compilation that could easily be silenced wit

[GSoC] Choosing a Project Proposal

Hi all, I'm Currently trying to decide on a project to work on in for Google Summer of Code, I'm stuck choosing between three which I find really interesting and I was wondering if any of them are particularly more pressing then the others. I would also love some comments on each of these three i

Re: git 1.9.1 tarball

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:09 PM, 乙酸鋰 wrote: > > Hi, > > Where to find git 1.9.1 tarball? > It is not uploaded to google code. > -- You can download a tarball for 1.9.1 from GitHub: https://github.com/git/git/archive/v1.9.1.tar.gz Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

[PATCH v3 2/2] log: add --show-linear-break to help see non-linear history

Option explanation is in rev-list-options.txt. The interaction with -z is left undecided. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy --- * Revert back to the old option name --show-linear-break * Get rid of saved_linear, use another flag in struct object instead * Fix not showing the break bar after

[PATCH v3 1/2] object.h: centralize object flag allocation

While the field "flags" is mainly used by the revision walker, it is also used in many other places. Centralize the whole flag allocation to one place for a better overview (and easier to move flags if we have too). Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy --- The next step could be define (instead o

[PATCH] Rewritten fsck.c:fsck_commit() through using starts_with() instead of memcmp()

Hi, I've done a microproject, number 15, "Rewrite fsck.c:fsck_commit() to use starts_with() and/or skip_prefix()." I used only starts_with(). memcmp() returns 0 when both are equal, therefore when replacing with starts_with() , I used "!" or deleted where appropriate. I plan to apply for the GS

<    1   2