Re: submodule..branch vs. submodule..branch

2014-03-27 Thread Junio C Hamano
"W. Trevor King" writes: >> [side note] Isn't that a typo of submodule..branch? > > Good catch. > > The transition from submodule..* to submodule..* happened > in 73b0898d (Teach "git submodule add" the --name option, 2012-09-30), > which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03. Thanks for diggin

submodule..branch vs. submodule..branch (was: Possible regression in master? (submodules without a "master" branch).

2014-03-27 Thread W. Trevor King
I'm breaking this off into a sub-thread, so it doesn't distract from the main issue. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:39:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > There is this bit for "update" in git-submodule.txt: > > For updates that clone missing submodules, checkout-mode updates > will create submod