On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:58:18PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Or am I missing some option to 'git applymbox' that I can't seem to
> > find?
>
> No. git-apply wants an exact bit-for-bit match. Partly because fuzz is
> hard, but mostly because I
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, the patch shows that there was another line at the end of the file,
> while in reality it isn't (this is due to me excluding a patch from the
> series that I'm applying due to other reasons.)
>
> Is this something that git can handle without me editing the
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Or am I missing some option to 'git applymbox' that I can't seem to
> find?
No. git-apply wants an exact bit-for-bit match. Partly because fuzz is
hard, but mostly because I don't like it. I apply a _lot_ of patches, and
if a unforgiving "git-apply" work
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:25:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Ick. I'm trying to apply a bunch of patches to a git repo (the kernel
> tree), using 'git applymbox' and it's just dieing on simple patches that
> apply with fuzz.
Ok, found another one. This time I looked at the patch itself, and it
is
4 matches
Mail list logo
