Re: git-svn metadata commands performance issue

2015-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Eric Wong writes: > How big is the parent process which forks the git commands? On Linux at > least, fork() performance is negatively impacted by parent process > memory size. Huh. I thought with the advent of demand-paging, at the very least with copy-on-write, this was supposed to be sort of

Re: git-svn metadata commands performance issue

2015-01-15 Thread Niluge kiwi
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Eric Wong wrote: > Niluge kiwi wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In magit (http://magit.github.io/), a popular git frontend within >> emacs, there is a git-svn frontend. With a recent refactoring, it was >> discovered that git-svn metadata commands (like "git-svn info") ar

Re: git-svn metadata commands performance issue

2015-01-14 Thread Eric Wong
Niluge kiwi wrote: > Hi all, > > In magit (http://magit.github.io/), a popular git frontend within > emacs, there is a git-svn frontend. With a recent refactoring, it was > discovered that git-svn metadata commands (like "git-svn info") are > much slower than git ones: > git svn info: 130-150ms

git-svn metadata commands performance issue

2015-01-13 Thread Niluge kiwi
Hi all, In magit (http://magit.github.io/), a popular git frontend within emacs, there is a git-svn frontend. With a recent refactoring, it was discovered that git-svn metadata commands (like "git-svn info") are much slower than git ones: git svn info: 130-150ms (after warmup): get the svn revisi