Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-31 Thread Junio C Hamano
Duy Nguyen writes: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * nd/gc-aggressive (2014-03-17) 4 commits >> - gc --aggressive: three phase repacking >> - gc --aggressive: make --depth configurable >> - pack-objects: support --keep >> - environment.c: fix constness for odb_pac

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-31 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 03/31/2014 07:56 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote: > I am new to git, so sorry If I overlooked something. > > I think there might be a race in ref_transaction_commit() when > deleting references. > > /* Perform deletes now that updates are safely completed */ > for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { >

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-31 Thread Ronnie Sahlberg
(now without HTML formatting) I am new to git, so sorry If I overlooked something. I think there might be a race in ref_transaction_commit() when deleting references. /* Perform deletes now that updates are safely completed */ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { struct ref_update *update = updates[i]; i

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael Haggerty writes: > On 03/28/2014 11:21 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with >> '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with >> '+' are in 'next'. > > Junio, > > Have you overlooked my ref-transactions series

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-29 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * nd/gc-aggressive (2014-03-17) 4 commits > - gc --aggressive: three phase repacking > - gc --aggressive: make --depth configurable > - pack-objects: support --keep > - environment.c: fix constness for odb_pack_keep() Using --before=1.y

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-29 Thread Max Horn
On 28.03.2014, at 23:21, Junio C Hamano wrote: [...] > * ap/remote-hg-skip-null-bookmarks (2014-03-25) 1 commit > (merged to 'next' on 2014-03-25 at a8cd922) > + remote-hg: do not fail on invalid bookmarks > > Will merge to 'master'. Just got back and had a chance to look at the patch you q

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-28 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 03/28/2014 11:21 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with > '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with > '+' are in 'next'. Junio, Have you overlooked my ref-transactions series [1], or just not gotten to it yet? I

What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-28 Thread Junio C Hamano
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. More topics merged to 'master', many of which are fallouts from GSoC microprojects. You can find the changes described here in the integration