Jonathan Nieder writes:
>> It is not known if a simple "yes/no" is sufficient in the longer
>> term, and what should happen when --recurse-submodules option starts
>> taking "recurse into them how?" parameter, though.
>
> Any pointers for where this has been discussed, if anywhere (e.g. was
I
Am 15.06.2017 um 07:42 schrieb Jeff King:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:03:29AM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
But there's more. strftime on Windows doesn't support common POSIX-
defined tokens like %F (%Y-%m-%d) and %T (%H:%M:%S). We could handle
them as well. Do we want that? At least we'd have to
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:03:29AM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> Am 14.06.2017 um 23:04 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, René Scharfe wrote:
> >
> >> Does someone actually expect %z to show time zone names instead of
> >> offsets on Windows?
> >
> > Not me ;-)
> >
> > I cann
Am 14.06.2017 um 23:04 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, René Scharfe wrote:
>
>> Does someone actually expect %z to show time zone names instead of
>> offsets on Windows?
>
> Not me ;-)
>
> I cannot speak for anyone else, as I lack that information, though.
Before the patch %
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, René Scharfe wrote:
> Does someone actually expect %z to show time zone names instead of
> offsets on Windows?
Not me ;-)
I cannot speak for anyone else, as I lack that information, though.
Ciao,
Dscho
Am 14.06.2017 um 13:10 schrieb Jeff King:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
But even then, it fails in t0006 on Windows with this error:
-- snip --
++ eval 'diff -u "$@" '
+++ diff -u expect actual
--- expect 2017-06-14 10:53:40.126136900 +
+++ actual
On 14.06.17 09:42, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
>> * ls/filter-process-delayed (2017-06-01) 5 commits
>> - convert: add "status=delayed" to filter process protocol
>> - convert: move multiple file filter error handling to separate function
>> - t0021: write "OUT" only on success
>> - t0021: make debug
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Hold on. Have you tried to build this branch?
>
> -- snip --
> CC date.o
> date.c:63:36: error: unknown type name ‘timestamp_t’
> static struct tm *time_to_tm_local(timestamp_t time)
> ^
> date.c: In function ‘show_date’:
> da
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Junio,
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > * rs/strbuf-addftime-zZ (2017-06-10) 2 commits
> > - date: use localtime() for "-local" time formats
> > - strbuf: let strbuf_addftime handle %z and %Z itself
>
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * rs/strbuf-addftime-zZ (2017-06-10) 2 commits
> - date: use localtime() for "-local" time formats
> - strbuf: let strbuf_addftime handle %z and %Z itself
>
> As there is no portable way to pass timezone information to
> strftime, some o
> On 13 Jun 2017, at 23:40, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>
> * ls/github (2017-06-13) 1 commit
> - Configure Git contribution guidelines for github.com
>
> Help contributors that visit us at GitHub.
>
> Will merge to 'next'.
I just pushed v3. If possible, please use it for 'next':
http://public-i
Jun 13, 2017 at 02:40:16PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * sb/submodule-blanket-recursive (2017-06-01) 9 commits
> (merged to 'next' on 2017-06-04 at 418bb03032)
> + builtin/fetch.c: respect 'submodule.recurse' option
> + builtin/push.c: respect 'submodule.recurse' option
> + builtin/grep.c:
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
You can find the changes described
13 matches
Mail list logo
