On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> The color experts agreed that (3) might be the best solution
>> as this gives most flexibility:
>>
>> "I would be happy as I can configure the bounds highlighting
>> to not exist, it would degenerate to a
Stefan Beller writes:
> The color experts agreed that (3) might be the best solution
> as this gives most flexibility:
>
> "I would be happy as I can configure the bounds highlighting
> to not exist, it would degenerate to a pure Zebra, which is
> very simple to understand. Junio seem
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>>
>> I will try to find some time tomorrow to go over it in detail.
>>
https://public-inbox.org/git/20170613023151.9688-1-sbel...@google.com/
restarted the discussion on this feature, so
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>
> I will try to find some time tomorrow to go over it in detail.
>
> Thanks,
> Jake
For the record, I got pulled into a project at work, so I won't have
spare time to look into this for the near future. :( Probably not
until next week.
Thank
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Michael Haggerty
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Stefan Beller wrote
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Michael Haggerty
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> [...]
> "git diff" has been taught to optionally p
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>>
>>> > [...]
>>> > "git diff" has been taught to optionally paint new lines that are
>>> > the same as deleted lines elsewher
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>
>> > [...]
>> > "git diff" has been taught to optionally paint new lines that are
>> > the same as deleted lines elsewhere differently from genuinely new
>> > lines.
>> >
>> > Are
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > "git diff" has been taught to optionally paint new lines that are
> > the same as deleted lines elsewhere differently from genuinely new
> > lines.
> >
> > Are we happy with these changes?
I've been studiously ignoring this
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>>> "git diff" has been taught to optionally paint new lines that are
>>> the same as deleted lines elsewhere differently from genuinely new
>>> lines.
>>>
>>> Are we happy with these changes?
>>
>> I advertised t
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> * sb/diff-color-move (2017-06-01) 17 commits
>> - diff.c: color moved lines differently
>> - diff: buffer all output if asked to
>> - diff.c: emit_line includes whitespace highlighting
>> - diff.c: convert diff_summary to use emit_line_*
Stefan Beller writes:
>> "git diff" has been taught to optionally paint new lines that are
>> the same as deleted lines elsewhere differently from genuinely new
>> lines.
>>
>> Are we happy with these changes?
>
> I advertised this series e.g. for reviewing Brandons
> repo object refactoring
> * sb/diff-color-move (2017-06-01) 17 commits
> - diff.c: color moved lines differently
> - diff: buffer all output if asked to
> - diff.c: emit_line includes whitespace highlighting
> - diff.c: convert diff_summary to use emit_line_*
> - diff.c: convert diff_flush to use emit_line_*
> - dif
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
With many fixes accumulated since
14 matches
Mail list logo