Mark Levedahl writes:
> I have been using this patch since Ramsey first sent it, have noticed
> no trouble over that time but all of my work is with filemode=true
> (has been since I started using git as Cygwin is a secondary platform
> for me and interoperability with repos on Linux is an absolu
On 08/01/2013 05:12 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ramsay Jones writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ramsay Jones writes:
I am personally in favor of this simpler solution. Comments?
I had expected this to me marked for 'master'.
Has this simply been overlooked, or do you have reservations about
On 2013-08-03 08.50, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 2013-08-01 22.51, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Ramsay Jones writes:
>>>
> I am personally in favor of this simpler solution. Comments?
I had expected this to me marked for 'master'.
Has this simply
On 2013-08-01 22.51, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Ramsay Jones writes:
>>
I am personally in favor of this simpler solution. Comments?
>>>
>>> I had expected this to me marked for 'master'.
>>>
>>> Has this simply been overlooked, or do you have reservations about
>>> appl
Ramsay Jones writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Ramsay Jones writes:
>>
I am personally in favor of this simpler solution. Comments?
>>>
>>> I had expected this to me marked for 'master'.
>>>
>>> Has this simply been overlooked, or do you have reservations about
>>> applying this patch?
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramsay Jones writes:
>
>>> I am personally in favor of this simpler solution. Comments?
>>
>> I had expected this to me marked for 'master'.
>>
>> Has this simply been overlooked, or do you have reservations about
>> applying this patch?
>
> I am just being careful and
Ramsay Jones writes:
>> I am personally in favor of this simpler solution. Comments?
>
> I had expected this to me marked for 'master'.
>
> Has this simply been overlooked, or do you have reservations about
> applying this patch?
I am just being careful and do want to keep it cooking in 'next'
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
> '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
> '+' are in 'next'.
>
> The shape of the upcoming release is pretty much known by now; all
> the topics that are marked for 'master' in
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
The shape of the upcoming release is pretty much known by now; all
the topics that are marked for 'master' in this issue will likely to
be in th
9 matches
Mail list logo