On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>>> Cruft in the codebase is a problem for git *developers* because it makes
>>> the code harder to maintain and extend.
>>
>> A problem big enough to warrant the rejection o
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Couple of facts first:
> a) This code was already merged
> b) This code is for a test
> c) I'm the only developer so far
>
>> Cruft in the codebase is a problem for git *developers* because it makes
>> the code harder to maintain and exten
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 12/15/2012 04:14 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> I'm going to say it one last time; merging this patch series either
>> creates issues for the users, or not. There is a reality out there,
>> independent of what you, Junio, or me think or
On 12/15/2012 04:14 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> I'm going to say it one last time; merging this patch series either
> creates issues for the users, or not. There is a reality out there,
> independent of what you, Junio, or me think or say. And the fact is,
> that if this patch series is going to
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> please stop referring to "facts" and "obvious". You pretend to be a being of
> pure reason and that everything you say is logical, drawn from facts. But you
> forget or perhaps do not know that logic by itself proofs nothing, it all
> depends
Felipe,
please stop referring to "facts" and "obvious". You pretend to be a being of
pure reason and that everything you say is logical, drawn from facts. But you
forget or perhaps do not know that logic by itself proofs nothing, it all
depends on the axioms you impose. And yours are quite diff
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> ...
>>> One of the review points were about this piece in the test:
>>>
>>> > +cmd=<>> > +import bzrlib
>>> > +bzrlib.initialize()
>>>
Felipe Contreras writes:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>> One of the review points were about this piece in the test:
>>
>> > +cmd=<> > +import bzrlib
>> > +bzrlib.initialize()
>> > +import bzrlib.plugin
>> > +bzrlib.plugin.load_plugins()
>>
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>>
> New remote helper for bzr (v3). With minor fixes, this may be ready
> for 'next'.
What minor fixes
Felipe Contreras writes:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
New remote helper for bzr (v3). With minor fixes, this may be ready
for 'next'.
>>>
>>> What minor fixes?
>>
>> Lookng at the above (fixup), $gmane/210744 comes to mind
>
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>
> On 13.12.2012, at 11:08, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>>
> New remote helper for bzr (v3). With minor fixes, this may be ready
> for 'next'.
On 13.12.2012, at 11:08, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
New remote helper for bzr (v3). With minor fixes, this may be ready
for 'next'.
>>>
>>> What minor fixes?
>>
>> Lookng at the above (fixup), $gma
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>>> New remote helper for bzr (v3). With minor fixes, this may be ready
>>> for 'next'.
>>
>> What minor fixes?
>
> Lookng at the above (fixup), $gmane/210744 comes to mind
That doesn't matter. The code and the
Felipe Contreras writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> [Stalled]
>>
>> * fc/remote-bzr (2012-11-28) 10 commits
>> - (fixup) test-bzr.sh: fix multi-line string assignment
>> - remote-bzr: detect local repositories
>> - remote-bzr: add support for older versions
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> [Stalled]
>
> * fc/remote-bzr (2012-11-28) 10 commits
> - (fixup) test-bzr.sh: fix multi-line string assignment
> - remote-bzr: detect local repositories
> - remote-bzr: add support for older versions of bzr
> - remote-bzr: add support
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
A new maintenance release 1.8.0.2 was tagged with accumulated fixes
we have already been using on the 'master' front for a while. The
tip of th
16 matches
Mail list logo
