Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> > Something like this will make the test more consistent with the rest of
>> > the file:
>> >
>> > diff --git a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
>> > index 5f29664..e5bbbd8 100755
>> > --- a/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
>> > +++ b/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
>> > @@ -220,7
Hi Lars & John,
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Lars Schneider wrote:
> > On 04 Aug 2016, at 13:32, John Keeping wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:03:39AM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote:
> >>
> >>> * jk/push-force-with-lease-creation (2016-07-26) 3 commits
> >>> - push: allow pushing new branches wit
> On 04 Aug 2016, at 13:32, John Keeping wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:03:39AM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> * jk/push-force-with-lease-creation (2016-07-26) 3 commits
>>> - push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease
>>> - push: add shorthand for --force-with-le
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:03:39AM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
> >
> > * jk/push-force-with-lease-creation (2016-07-26) 3 commits
> > - push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease
> > - push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation
> > - Documentation/git-push: fix pl
>
> * jk/push-force-with-lease-creation (2016-07-26) 3 commits
> - push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease
> - push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation
> - Documentation/git-push: fix placeholder formatting
>
> "git push --force-with-lease" already had enough l
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Jakub Narębski wrote:>
> Could you apply the first part (the first patch) of the series,
> namely:
>
>- clarify %f documentation
Thanks. That's a good idea.
> P.S. I guess that filter..process series is considered
> pre-cooking?
Yes. I've been waiting to
W dniu 03.08.2016 o 00:24, Junio C Hamano pisze:
> --
> [Stalled]
>
> * jh/clean-smudge-annex (2016-08-01) 9 commits
> - use smudgeToFile filter in recursive merge
> - use smudgeToFile filter in git am
> - better recovery from failure of smudgeTo
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
On the 'master' front, the individ
8 matches
Mail list logo