* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > The name of the tarball needs to be updated as well.
>
> Yes, I noticed.
>
> I ended up renaming the spec-file too.
>
> Pushed out,
Yup, looks good.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> The name of the tarball needs to be updated as well.
Yes, I noticed.
I ended up renaming the spec-file too.
Pushed out,
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ahh. Dang, I should have remembered this. We should call the rpm
> "git-core-0.99", not just "git-0.99".
>
> Chris, I assume this is just changing the name in the spec-file from "git"
> to "git-core"?
The name of the tarball needs to be updated as we
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> One last issue with building packages. Some distros are still shipping
> GNU interactive tools so git as a package name for the rpm is problematic.
> At the very least it is extremely confusing that git-0.99 is a more
> recent package that git-4
Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > And it does not pass my torture test of building rpm's on debian,
>> > but that is not a huge problem.
>>
>> Ok, why is debian problematic? Is there some missing dependency or
>> something? I really haven
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> Actually I was looking at doing a git-ident thing that will
>> just compute who git thinks you are. And then git-commit-tree can
>> just popen it to share code. That looks like how the logic has
>>
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Actually I was looking at doing a git-ident thing that will
> just compute who git thinks you are. And then git-commit-tree can
> just popen it to share code. That looks like how the logic has
> been accomplished in other places.
I hate popen(
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> Are you still up for a patch that records who and when made a tag?
>> I sent one but it seems to have been lost.
>
> I'd really actually prefer for the code to be shared with the commit code,
> so that
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> A couple of pieces. The dist target has assumes git-tar-tree is in the
>> path. Making it so you have to have git installed to build the rpm.
>
> Yes. Maybe we could relax that requirement by using
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > A couple of pieces. The dist target has assumes git-tar-tree is in the
> > path. Making it so you have to have git installed to build the rpm.
> Yes. Maybe we could relax that requirement by using "./gi
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > A couple of pieces. The dist target has assumes git-tar-tree is in the
> > path. Making it so you have to have git installed to build the rpm.
>
> Yes. Maybe we could relax that requirement by us
* Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, I tagged a "v0.99" thing, and pushed it out. I've also made trial
> > RPM's of it: src, ppc64 and x86. They're build on whatever random machines
> > I had, and on the ppc64 I chose to do it on m
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> A couple of pieces. The dist target has assumes git-tar-tree is in the
> path. Making it so you have to have git installed to build the rpm.
Yes. Maybe we could relax that requirement by using "./git-tar-tree" or
something? That still require
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I tagged a "v0.99" thing, and pushed it out. I've also made trial
> RPM's of it: src, ppc64 and x86. They're build on whatever random machines
> I had, and on the ppc64 I chose to do it on my FC4 machine that has newer
> libraries than my YDL one
Ok, I tagged a "v0.99" thing, and pushed it out. I've also made trial
RPM's of it: src, ppc64 and x86. They're build on whatever random machines
I had, and on the ppc64 I chose to do it on my FC4 machine that has newer
libraries than my YDL one. The x86 thing is FC3, I do believe.
I haven't re
15 matches
Mail list logo
