From: "Junio C Hamano"
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:47 AM
Junio C Hamano writes:
I've played with both and have prepared patches to Reintegrate and
cook (both in the 'todo' branch). Will play with the changes a bit
more and then decide.
So here is how tonight's "What's cooking" may l
On 09/14/2012 06:47 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> So here is how tonight's "What's cooking" may look like with extra
> indentation and blank lines. [...]
I find this much more readable than the old format. Thanks!
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhag...@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com
From: "Junio C Hamano"
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 3:29 AM
Andrew Ardill writes:
On 14 September 2012 04:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Andrew Ardill writes:
* ()
()
[list-of-commits]
()
I do not see how it makes any sense to have the "This is where the
section
Junio C Hamano writes:
> I've played with both and have prepared patches to Reintegrate and
> cook (both in the 'todo' branch). Will play with the changes a bit
> more and then decide.
So here is how tonight's "What's cooking" may look like with extra
indentation and blank lines.
The tools tha
Andrew Ardill writes:
> I feel a little bit like I might be bikeshedding this...
Yes you are.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 14 September 2012 12:29, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Andrew Ardill writes:
>
>> On 14 September 2012 04:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Andrew Ardill writes:
>>>
* ()
()
[list-of-commits]
()
>>>
>>> I do not see how it makes any sens
Andrew Ardill writes:
> On 14 September 2012 04:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Andrew Ardill writes:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * ()
>>> ()
>>>[list-of-commits]
>>> ()
>>
>> I do not see how it makes any sense to have the "This is where the
>> section begins with, and its na
On 14 September 2012 04:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Andrew Ardill writes:
>
>> Currently, the output for each branch looks something like:
>> * ()
>> ()
>> [list-of-commits]
>> ()
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> and these are grouped by current integration status (new, graduated,
>> stalled etc)
>
> Yes
Andrew Ardill writes:
> Currently, the output for each branch looks something like:
> * ()
> ()
> [list-of-commits]
> ()
>
>
>
>
> and these are grouped by current integration status (new, graduated,
> stalled etc)
Yes. Thanks for a concise summary.
> A format that would make this in
"Philip Oakley" writes:
>> Thinking about it, if the description paragraph was indented by one
>> space then the * title would create that obvious content indent
>> that (I am) would be expected.
>>
>> Obviously only a useful suggestion if it's easy to implement...
>>
>> Philip
> Thinking overni
From: "Philip Oakley"
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:49 PM
From: "Jens Lehmann"
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:21 PM
Am 11.09.2012 21:41, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Thanks. I wish all others paid attention to "What's cooking" like
you did here.
And if it is hard to do so for wha
On 09/13/2012 12:49 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
> My comment, as a simple reader, is that I misread the order of the
> items, in that I miss-associate the description paragraph with the *
> title _below_. That is, I see the description first and then read on...
>
> Thinking about it, if the descrip
(sorry about double replying - html sub-part creeped in!)
On 13 September 2012 08:49, Philip Oakley wrote:
>
> From: "Jens Lehmann"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:21 PM
>
>> Am 11.09.2012 21:41, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>>
>>> Thanks. I wish all others paid attention to "What's cooking"
From: "Jens Lehmann"
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:21 PM
Am 11.09.2012 21:41, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Thanks. I wish all others paid attention to "What's cooking" like
you did here.
And if it is hard to do so for whatever reason, suggest a better way
for me to publish "What's cooking"
Dan Johnson writes:
> I was thinking about this earlier. I wondered if it might even be
> worth it just to CC the authors of all topics whose status has changed
> since the last what's cooking, to make sure that they see updates
> pertinent to them. I know that I at least have filters which catch
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Am 11.09.2012 21:41, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Thanks. I wish all others paid attention to "What's cooking" like
>> you did here.
>>
>> And if it is hard to do so for whatever reason, suggest a better way
>> for me to publish "What's cooking
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:21:46PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Am 11.09.2012 21:41, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> > Thanks. I wish all others paid attention to "What's cooking" like
> > you did here.
> >
> > And if it is hard to do so for whatever reason, suggest a better way
> > for me to publish
Am 11.09.2012 21:41, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Thanks. I wish all others paid attention to "What's cooking" like
> you did here.
>
> And if it is hard to do so for whatever reason, suggest a better way
> for me to publish "What's cooking" or an equivalent (I am interested
> in finding the least b
18 matches
Mail list logo