Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing

2017-01-27 Thread Junio C Hamano
Cornelius Weig writes: > -Do not PGP sign your patch, -at least for now-. Most likely, your (...) > +Do not PGP sign your patch. Most likely, your maintainer or other (...) It has been quite a while since we wrote that "at least for now", so it probably makes sense to drop it. >> Maybe even s/b

Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing

2017-01-27 Thread Cornelius Weig
On 01/26/2017 09:58 PM, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Junio C Hamano" >> Cornelius Weig writes: >> >>> How about something along these lines? Does the forward reference >>> break the main line of thought too severly? >> >> I find it a bit distracting for those who know PGP signing has >> nothin

Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing

2017-01-26 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Junio C Hamano" Cornelius Weig writes: How about something along these lines? Does the forward reference break the main line of thought too severly? I find it a bit distracting for those who know PGP signing has nothing to do with signing off your patch, but I think that is OK becaus

Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing

2017-01-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
Cornelius Weig writes: > How about something along these lines? Does the forward reference > break the main line of thought too severly? I find it a bit distracting for those who know PGP signing has nothing to do with signing off your patch, but I think that is OK because they are not the prima

Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing

2017-01-26 Thread Stefan Beller
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:30 AM, Cornelius Weig wrote: > >> >> Yeah I agree. My patch was not the best shot by far. >> > > How about something along these lines? Does the forward reference > break the main line of thought too severly? > > diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentatio

Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing

2017-01-26 Thread Cornelius Weig
> > Yeah I agree. My patch was not the best shot by far. > How about something along these lines? Does the forward reference break the main line of thought too severly? diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index 08352de..c2b0cbe 100644 --- a/Documentat

Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing

2017-01-25 Thread Stefan Beller
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Philip Oakley wrote: >> -Do not PGP sign your patch, at least for now. Most likely, your >> -maintainer or other people on the list would not have your PGP >> -key and would not bother obtaining it anyway. Your patch is not >> -judged by who you are; a good patc

Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing

2017-01-24 Thread Philip Oakley
00:00 2001 From: Stefan Beller Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:19:13 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller --- Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Document