On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> The thread I started at
> https://public-inbox.org/git/87bmhiykvw@evledraar.gmail.com/ should
> also be of interest. I.e. we could have some knobs to create more
> "stable" packs, I know rsync does some in-file hashing,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 at 19:41, ardi wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Some of my Git repositories have mirrors, maintained with 'rsync'. I
> want to have some level of repacking, so that the repositories are
> efficient, but I also want it to minimize it, so that 'rsync' never
> has to perform a big transfer for
On Mon, Jul 29 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 01:41:34AM +0200, ardi wrote:
>
>> Some of my Git repositories have mirrors, maintained with 'rsync'. I
>> want to have some level of repacking, so that the repositories are
>> efficient, but I also want it to minimize it, so that '
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 01:41:34AM +0200, ardi wrote:
> Some of my Git repositories have mirrors, maintained with 'rsync'. I
> want to have some level of repacking, so that the repositories are
> efficient, but I also want it to minimize it, so that 'rsync' never
> has to perform a big transfer fo
Hi!
Some of my Git repositories have mirrors, maintained with 'rsync'. I
want to have some level of repacking, so that the repositories are
efficient, but I also want it to minimize it, so that 'rsync' never
has to perform a big transfer for the repositories.
For example, I think it would be fine
5 matches
Mail list logo