On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> >
> > p.s. i suspect i should RTFS to see exactly how git bisect does its
> > work.
>
> You might want to read
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect-lk2009.html before reading the
> source
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> p.s. i suspect i should RTFS to see exactly how git bisect does its
> work.
You might want to read https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect-lk2009.html
before reading the source code.
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> "Robert P. J. Day" writes:
> >>
> >> > i'm confused ... why, after skipping a good chunk in the interval
> >> > [v4.13,v4.14], do i
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> "Robert P. J. Day" writes:
>>
>> > i'm confused ... why, after skipping a good chunk in the interval
>> > [v4.13,v4.14], do i still have exactly 7300 revisions to bisect? what
>> > am i so
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Robert P. J. Day" writes:
>
> > i'm confused ... why, after skipping a good chunk in the interval
> > [v4.13,v4.14], do i still have exactly 7300 revisions to bisect? what
> > am i so hopelessly misunderstanding here?
>
> Are you really "skipping" a
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Robert P. J. Day" writes:
>
> > i'm confused ... why, after skipping a good chunk in the
> > interval [v4.13,v4.14], do i still have exactly 7300 revisions to
> > bisect? what am i so hopelessly misunderstanding here?
>
> Are you really "skipping" a
"Robert P. J. Day" writes:
> i'm confused ... why, after skipping a good chunk in the interval
> [v4.13,v4.14], do i still have exactly 7300 revisions to bisect? what
> am i so hopelessly misunderstanding here?
Are you really "skipping" a chunk in the interval?
I thought that "git bisect skip
7 matches
Mail list logo