On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:47:07AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Scott McPeak writes:
>
> > I suggest that this problem could easily have been avoided if "git
> > stash" refused to run with a pending merge (present MERGE_HEAD file),
> > since this is crucial repository state that it does not sav
On 06/07/13 11:47, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Scott McPeak writes:
I suggest that this problem could easily have been avoided if "git
stash" refused to run with a pending merge (present MERGE_HEAD file),
since this is crucial repository state that it does not save. This
seems similar to what "git
Scott McPeak writes:
> I suggest that this problem could easily have been avoided if "git
> stash" refused to run with a pending merge (present MERGE_HEAD file),
> since this is crucial repository state that it does not save. This
> seems similar to what "git cherry-pick" does.
Sounds senslbe.
3 matches
Mail list logo