Dear diary, on Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:10:53PM CEST, I got a letter
where Sergey Vlasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> However, cg-export is buggy - if you use the second argument
> (cg-export DESTFILE TREE_ID), the resulting tar file is different
> from what git-tar-tree produces for the sa
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:00:51 +0200 Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 07:05:11AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
[...]
> > snap=git-snapshot-$(date +"%Y%m%d")
> > git-tar-tree HEAD $snap | gzip -9 > $snap.tar.gz
> >
> >
Dear diary, on Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 07:05:11AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> If you really want a temporary tree, what you do is something like
>
> git-checkout-cache --prefix=tmp-dir/ -f -a
>
> and when you're done, you just do
>
> r
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > Git actually has a _lot_ of nifty tools. I didn't realize that people
> > didn't know about such basic stuff as "git-tar-tree" and "git-ls-files".
>
> Maybe its because things are moving so fast :) Or maybe I just wasn't
> paying attention on th
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Git actually has a _lot_ of nifty tools. I didn't realize that people
> didn't know about such basic stuff as "git-tar-tree" and "git-ls-files".
Btw, I just checked that git-tar-tree is documented and has a man-page. It
does. However, that man-p
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:05:11PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> HOWEVER, if all you want to do is just a tar-file, then there's a better
> solution. It's called
>
> snap=git-snapshot-$(date +"%Y%m%d")
> git-tar-tree HEAD $snap | gzip -9 > $snap.tar.gz
>
> which is even easier
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> My git snapshot creator that builds the hourly tarballs at
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/git-snapshots/
> currently does an rsync, and then a checkout, and finally
> it cleans up by removing all the checked out files.
> It currently does this b
Gar, got caught by the 'reply-to' going to Tony only...
Dave
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:31:17AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> I've just got around to noticing some of the new (to
> me) features in git, and started experimenting with
> branches.
Seems a good
"Luck, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see that when I switch view to a different
> branch with:
>
> $ git checkout -f someoldbranch
>
> that any files that exist in my previous branch view
> but not in "someoldbranch" are not deleted.
>
> ... I wondered whether this was a deliberate c
9 matches
Mail list logo
