Re: git blame --follow

2012-09-06 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:12:42PM +0200, norbert.nemec wrote: > The option should either be rejected or do *something* documented and > useful. Ideally, it should result in behavior that matches 'git log > --follow' as closely as possible. So maybe, it should be a synonym > for a certain number o

Re: git blame --follow

2012-09-06 Thread norbert.nemec
Thanks for the explanation. I actually do not have any clear opinion what it should do. Just that the current situation is confusing when experimenting and trying to understand the behavior of git blame and git log: an intuitive option that is accepted but ignored. The option should either b

Re: git blame --follow

2012-09-06 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:02:17AM +0200, norbert.nemec wrote: > 'git blame --follow' seems to be undocumented. The exact behavior is > not clear to me. Perhaps an alias for some combination of '-C' and > '-M'? It seems not be be fully consistent with 'git log --follow'. > > Could someone clarify