> On 21 Mar 2017, at 18:43, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Lars Schneider writes:
>
>> Agreed. Would it be OK to store the "delayed" bit in the cache
>> entry itself? The extended ce_flags are stored on disk which is not
>> necessary I think. Would a new member in the cache_entry struct be
>> an ac
Lars Schneider writes:
> Agreed. Would it be OK to store the "delayed" bit in the cache
> entry itself? The extended ce_flags are stored on disk which is not
> necessary I think. Would a new member in the cache_entry struct be
> an acceptable option?
I'd imagine that those with thousands of cach
> On 06 Mar 2017, at 22:08, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Lars Schneider writes:
>
>>> On 04 Mar 2017, at 00:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> * ls/filter-process-delayed (2017-01-08) 1 commit
>>> . convert: add "status=delayed" to filter process protocol
Sorry for the delayed response. I
Lars Schneider writes:
>> On 04 Mar 2017, at 00:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>
>> * ls/filter-process-delayed (2017-01-08) 1 commit
>> . convert: add "status=delayed" to filter process protocol
>>
>> Ejected, as does not build when merged to 'pu'.
>
> I send v2 [1] where I tried to address t
Hey Stephan
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Stephan Beyer wrote:
> Hi Pranit,
>
> On 03/04/2017 12:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> --
>> [Stalled]
> [...]
>>
>> * pb/bisect (2017-02-18) 28 commits
>> - fixup! bisect--helper: `bisect_next_check` & b
> On 04 Mar 2017, at 00:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>
> * ls/filter-process-delayed (2017-01-08) 1 commit
> . convert: add "status=delayed" to filter process protocol
>
> Ejected, as does not build when merged to 'pu'.
I send v2 [1] where I tried to address the points in your feedback [2].
v
Hi Pranit,
On 03/04/2017 12:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> --
> [Stalled]
[...]
>
> * pb/bisect (2017-02-18) 28 commits
> - fixup! bisect--helper: `bisect_next_check` & bisect_voc shell function in C
> - bisect--helper: remove the dequote in bisec
7 matches
Mail list logo