"brian m. carlson" writes:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:20:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I had an impression that the series may see at least one reroll to
>> polish it further before it gets ready for 'next', as I only saw
>> discussions on the tangent (e.g. possible futures) and didn't s
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:20:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I had an impression that the series may see at least one reroll to
> polish it further before it gets ready for 'next', as I only saw
> discussions on the tangent (e.g. possible futures) and didn't see
> serious reviews of the code t
"Kyle J. McKay" writes:
>> Will cook in 'next'.
>
> Has this been merged to 'next'? Even fetching
> github.com/gitster/git.git I'm only seeing it in pu:
That was a short-hand for "will merge and cook in 'next'" ;-)
I had an impression that the series may see at least one reroll to
polish it fu
On Mar 20, 2015, at 16:29, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Kyle J. McKay
wrote:
On Mar 20, 2015, at 15:02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* bc/object-id (2015-03-13) 10 commits
[snip]
Will cook in 'next'.
Has this been merged to 'next'?
Usually Junio writes the mail fi
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Kyle J. McKay wrote:
> Has this been merged to 'next'?
Usually Junio writes the mail first and then does a git push
just before being done for the day. At least that's my suspicion as an
observer of
the timing when git fetch returns new shiny stuff and when thes
On Mar 20, 2015, at 15:02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* bc/object-id (2015-03-13) 10 commits
- apply: convert threeway_stage to object_id
- patch-id: convert to use struct object_id
- commit: convert parts to struct object_id
- diff: convert struct combine_diff_path to object_id
- bulk-checkin.c: con
6 matches
Mail list logo
