Junio C Hamano writes:
> * tr/test-v-and-v-subtest-only (2013-06-18) 8 commits
> - test-lib: support running tests under valgrind in parallel
> - test-lib: allow prefixing a custom string before "ok N" etc.
> - test-lib: valgrind for only tests matching a pattern
> - test-lib: verbose mode fo
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Because the implementation is too ugly.
I know :) The only reason I sent it with code is because I didn't get
any responses to an email without code. If you agree that it is a
useful feature, we have to figure out a beautiful implementation.
> I would however can imagine
Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> - rr/describe-contains-all at $gmane/228278.
>>
>> This may overlap with a topic in flight (but I didn't look at it).
>
> Let me know if I can do anything to make it easier for you. I'm quite
> excited about this one.
>
>>> - rr/mixed-cas
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Unfortunately, I tend to become bottleneck more often than you do,
> so I do not think that would be a good use of my time.
Besides, as Antoine points out, those numbers might well be useless
(or worse, misleading). It's probably not worth the effort.
> Which ones went un
Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> ... I've noticed a significant decline in
>>> list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been
>>> reviewed.
>>
>> Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening.
>
> Observer bias. To verify either claim, could you run
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> ... I've noticed a significant decline in
>>> list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been
>>> reviewed.
>>
>> Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening.
>
> Observer bias. To ver
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> ... I've noticed a significant decline in
>> list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been
>> reviewed.
>
> Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening.
Observer bias. To verify either claim, could you run some stats on
the ML archives [1] and re
Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
> ... I've noticed a significant decline in
> list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been
> reviewed.
Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening.
I actually think all the usual suspects (I could name them, but I
wouldn't---you know who y
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> - rr/describe-contains-all at $gmane/228278.
>
> This may overlap with a topic in flight (but I didn't look at it).
Let me know if I can do anything to make it easier for you. I'm quite
excited about this one.
>> - rr/mixed-case-aliases at $gmane/227959.
>
> Personally,
Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
> Four topics are awaiting review (they're important to me in this order):
>
> - rr/for-each-ref-pretty at $gmane/227057.
No comment on this at this moment.
> - rr/describe-contains-all at $gmane/228278.
This may overlap with a topic in flight (but I didn't look a
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * rr/triangle-push-fix (2013-06-20) 9 commits
> - push: honor branch.*.push
> - SQUASH??? fix git-config push.default description
> - SQUASH??? minimum "simple" safety fix-up
> - t/t5528-push-default: test pushdefault workflows
> - t/t5528-push-default: generalize test_
11 matches
Mail list logo
