On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:24:52AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt writes:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:31:14PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:11:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> > "--keep-empty" has always been about keeping an orig
Patrick Steinhardt writes:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:31:14PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:11:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> [snip]
>> > "--keep-empty" has always been about keeping an originally empty
>> > commit, not a commit that becomes empty because of rebasin
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:31:14PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:11:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[snip]
> > "--keep-empty" has always been about keeping an originally empty
> > commit, not a commit that becomes empty because of rebasing
> > (i.e. what has already been ap
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:29:40PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
> From a selfish perspective, I, would prefer for object-ids to not happen
> quite yet for the refs code. I have already prepared (but not yet sent)
> a new version of the refs backend vtable (and lmdb) code on top of
> refs-backend-pre
Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:11:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I think I managed to get my working area (together with a handful of
>> new entries in the rerere database and a few merge-fix/ entries) in
>> sync with what you pushed out well enough that my automated
>> pr
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 14:11 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2015, #01; Tue, 1)
> > --
> >
> > Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
> > '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed
Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:31:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I just finished my first pass of going through "cook -w" output and
>> had trouble judging jk/send-email-ssl-errors topic, which is marked
>> as "waiting for re-roll", but I cannot seem to find any discussion
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:31:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I just finished my first pass of going through "cook -w" output and
> had trouble judging jk/send-email-ssl-errors topic, which is marked
> as "waiting for re-roll", but I cannot seem to find any discussion
> on it, just the origina
Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:11:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I think I managed to get my working area (together with a handful of
>> new entries in the rerere database and a few merge-fix/ entries) in
>> sync with what you pushed out well enough that my automated
>> pr
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:11:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I think I managed to get my working area (together with a handful of
> new entries in the rerere database and a few merge-fix/ entries) in
> sync with what you pushed out well enough that my automated
> procedure would recreate the
Jeff King writes:
> What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2015, #01; Tue, 1)
> --
>
> Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
> '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
> '+' are in 'next'.
>
> This sho
11 matches
Mail list logo
