Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Segmentation fault with latest git (070c57df)

2013-02-03 Thread Jongman Heo
Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Jongman Heo wrote: > >>> But it doesn't stimulate any prerequisites in make, which is weird. >>> What's in builtin/.depend/fetch.o.d? >[...] >> please see below~. >> >> $ cat builtin/.depend/fetch.o.d >> fetch.o: builtin/fetch.c cache.h git-compat-util.h compa

Re: Re: Re: Re: Segmentation fault with latest git (070c57df)

2013-02-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Jongman Heo wrote: >> But it doesn't stimulate any prerequisites in make, which is weird. >> What's in builtin/.depend/fetch.o.d? [...] > please see below~. > > $ cat builtin/.depend/fetch.o.d > fetch.o: builtin/fetch.c cache.h git-compat-util.h compat/bswap.h \ That's the problem. S

Re: Re: Re: Re: Segmentation fault with latest git (070c57df)

2013-02-01 Thread Jongman Heo
>> [...] >> Finished prerequisites of target file `builtin/fetch.o'. >> Prerequisite `builtin/fetch.c' is older than target `builtin/fetch.o'. >> Prerequisite `GIT-CFLAGS' is older than target `builtin/fetch.o'. >> No need to remake target `builtin/fetch.o'. > >But it doesn't stimulate any prer

Re: Re: Re: Segmentation fault with latest git (070c57df)

2013-02-01 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:30:24AM +, Jongman Heo wrote: > Short answer; > > * Version of make is 3.81 on both machines > * builtin/fetch.o is not rebuilt (see entire log below) > * git works fine with "make all install COMPUTE_HEADER_DEPENDENCIES=no" OK, that gets us closer. It's defini

Re: Re: Re: Segmentation fault with latest git (070c57df)

2013-01-31 Thread 허종만
> It's almost like the compiler is getting the initializer wrong. It's a > long shot, but I wonder if the presence of the bitfield could be > triggering a compiler bug (or there is a subtle C rule about bitfield > initializations that I do not know). Just for the sake of my sanity, > what does the