For the record, mostly... (this is how it already is in git-pasky-0.5)
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:07:36AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > Now, what about git branch and git update for switching between
> > branches? I think this is the
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:17:00AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > > Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:47:55AM CEST, I got a letter
> > >
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 01:07:35AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > Actually, what about if git pull outside of repository did what git
> > clone does now? I'd kinda like clone instead of fork too.
>
> This seems like the best solution
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:17:00AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:47:55AM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that..
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:06:54AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
> > I think "fork" is as good as anything for describing the operation. I had
> > thought about "clone" because it seemed to f
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:06:54AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > I'm sorry but you are late, I added it about a hour and half ago or so.
> > :-) Check git fork. (I *want* separate command than
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:16:12AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering, whether each tree should be fixed to a certain branch.
>
> I'm wondering why you talk about "branches" at a
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:47:55AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > git branch --- creates a branch from a given commit
> > (when passed empty commit, creates a branch
> >
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> I'm wondering, whether each tree should be fixed to a certain branch.
I'm wondering why you talk about "branches" at all.
No such thing should exist. There are no branches. There are just
repositories. You can track somebody elses repository, but yo
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:47:55AM CEST, I got a letter
where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> git branch --- creates a branch from a given commit
> (when passed empty commit, creates a branch
> from the current commit a
10 matches
Mail list logo
