Re: [git] Re: [WIP/PATCH 4/9] Teach merge the --[no-]recurse-submodules option

2014-02-07 Thread W. Trevor King
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:00:23PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jens Lehmann writes: > > I think the user needs to sort things out, just like she has to do > > when a file has a merge conflict. But unfortunately we cannot use > > conflict markers here, so I'd propose the following: > > > > * Whe

Re: [WIP/PATCH 4/9] Teach merge the --[no-]recurse-submodules option

2014-02-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jens Lehmann writes: > I think the user needs to sort things out, just like she has to do > when a file has a merge conflict. But unfortunately we cannot use > conflict markers here, so I'd propose the following: > > * When merge proposes a merge resolution (which it does today by > telling the

Re: [WIP/PATCH 4/9] Teach merge the --[no-]recurse-submodules option

2014-02-07 Thread Jens Lehmann
Am 04.02.2014 00:01, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Jens Lehmann writes: > >> This new option will allow the user to not only update the work tree of >> the superproject according to the merge result but to also update the >> work tree of all initialized submodules (so they match the SHA-1 recorded >>

Re: [WIP/PATCH 4/9] Teach merge the --[no-]recurse-submodules option

2014-02-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jens Lehmann writes: > This new option will allow the user to not only update the work tree of > the superproject according to the merge result but to also update the > work tree of all initialized submodules (so they match the SHA-1 recorded > in the superproject). But this commit only adds the