Eric Wong wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > I guess your patch won't hurt.
>
> Cool, will update tests and resend.
Turns out the t3206 "trivial reordering" case is way too noisy.
I might need to change diff.c to support this case; will update
in a few days or week.
Eric Wong writes:
> What Konstantin said about git repos being transient.
> It wasn't too much work to recreate those blobs from
> scratch since git-apply has done it since 2005.
;-)
> We could get around transient repos with automatic mirroring
> bots which never deletes or overwrites anything
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Eric Wong wrote:
>
> > (WIP, mostly stream-of-concious notes + reasoning)
> >
> > When using "git format-patch --range-diff", the pre and
> > post-image blob OIDs are in each email, while the exact
> > commit OIDs are rarely share
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:18:35PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
As to recreating blobs from mails: Wow. That's quite a length you're
going, and I think it is a shame that you have to. If only every
contribution came accompanied with a pullable branch in a public
repository.
Trouble is, tho
Hi Eric,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Eric Wong wrote:
> (WIP, mostly stream-of-concious notes + reasoning)
>
> When using "git format-patch --range-diff", the pre and
> post-image blob OIDs are in each email, while the exact
> commit OIDs are rarely shared via emails (only the tip
> commit from "git re
5 matches
Mail list logo
