> Le 7 juin 2016 à 08:58, Matthieu Moy a écrit :
>
> "Philip Oakley" writes:
>
>> Given that clarification I'd be happier to go with it being one's
>> 'Publish' repo.
>>
>> My initial reticence was because of the association of "publish" with
>> vanity publishing and other forms of over-sharin
"Philip Oakley" writes:
> Given that clarification I'd be happier to go with it being one's
> 'Publish' repo.
>
> My initial reticence was because of the association of "publish" with
> vanity publishing and other forms of over-sharing and self promotion.
>
> A clarification/explanation that call
From: "Junio C Hamano"
Jordan DE GEA writes:
+TRIANGULAR WORKFLOW
+---
+
+In some projects, you cannot push directly to the project but have to
+suggest your commits to the maintainer (e.g. pull requests).
+For these projects, it's common to use what's called a *triangular
+wo
Jordan DE GEA writes:
> +TRIANGULAR WORKFLOW
> +---
> +
> +In some projects, you cannot push directly to the project but have to
> +suggest your commits to the maintainer (e.g. pull requests).
> +For these projects, it's common to use what's called a *triangular
> +workflow*:
> +
4 matches
Mail list logo
