On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 14:17 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> (apologies in advance if I may bring up anything that has been
> discussed
> in earlier iterations; I simply was too busy with the rebase--helper
> project to even look.)
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, David Turner wrote:
>
>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
>> We keep this daemon's logic as thin as possible. The "brain" stays in
>> git. So the daemon can read and validate stuff, but that's all it's
>> allowed to do. It does not add/create new information. It doesn't even
>> accept direct upd
Hi Duy,
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:27 AM, David Turner
> wrote:
> > Shared memory is done by storing files in a per-repository temporary
> > directory. This is more portable than shm (which requires
> > posix-realtime and has various quirks on OS X). It
Hi Dave,
(apologies in advance if I may bring up anything that has been discussed
in earlier iterations; I simply was too busy with the rebase--helper
project to even look.)
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, David Turner wrote:
> Shared memory is done by storing files in a per-repository temporary
> director
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 07:31 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:27 AM, David Turner <
> dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > Shared memory is done by storing files in a per-repository
> > temporary
> > directory. This is more portable than shm (which requires
> > posix-realtime an
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:27 AM, David Turner wrote:
> Shared memory is done by storing files in a per-repository temporary
> directory. This is more portable than shm (which requires
> posix-realtime and has various quirks on OS X). It might even work on
> Windows, although this has not been te
6 matches
Mail list logo
