Phillip Wood writes:
> Thanks for the tips, tbdiff looks useful (I just need to learn to read
> diffs of diffs!). I also find rebasing them on a common ancestor useful
> but its a bit tedious.
Yes, comparing two versions of a series is somewhat unusual and
needs getting used to before one can do
Hi Junio
On 28/02/18 15:37, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Phillip Wood writes:
>
>> Is there an easy way for contributors to compare the branch they post to
>> what ends up it pu?
>
> Distributed work is pretty much symmetric, so it can be done the
> same way as one would review a rerolled series by
Phillip Wood writes:
> Is there an easy way for contributors to compare the branch they post to
> what ends up it pu?
Distributed work is pretty much symmetric, so it can be done the
same way as one would review a rerolled series by another co-worker.
$ git log --oneline --first-parent origin/
On 27/02/18 22:35, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Phillip Wood writes:
>
>> From: Phillip Wood
>>
>> Indent here documents in line with the current style for tests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood
>> ---
>
> This loses the hand-edit-while-queuing done based on Eric's comment
> for the previous roun
Phillip Wood writes:
> From: Phillip Wood
>
> Indent here documents in line with the current style for tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood
> ---
This loses the hand-edit-while-queuing done based on Eric's comment
for the previous round (see what has been queued on 'pu' for quite a
while), w
5 matches
Mail list logo
