On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 18:21 -0400, David Turner wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 13:29 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> > I reviewed the patches up to here pretty carefully, and aside from the
> > comments I already sent, they look good.
> >
> > I like the new approach where the ref_transaction-buil
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 13:29 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> I reviewed the patches up to here pretty carefully, and aside from the
> comments I already sent, they look good.
>
> I like the new approach where the ref_transaction-building code is
> shared across backends.
>
> It seems to me that a
I reviewed the patches up to here pretty carefully, and aside from the
comments I already sent, they look good.
I like the new approach where the ref_transaction-building code is
shared across backends.
It seems to me that a good breaking point for the first batch of patches
would be here, just b
On 10/12/2015 11:51 PM, David Turner wrote:
> The common ref code will build up a ref transaction. Backends will
> then commit it. So the transaction creation and update functions should
> be in the common code. We also need to move the ref structs into
> the common code so that alternate backen
4 matches
Mail list logo
