On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
> > Interdiff below:
>
> Thanks. Looks much more polished.
>
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-stash.txt b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> > index 89b6a0e672..8be661007d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> > +++
Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:19:38AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > - This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'.
>> > + This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'. It
>> > + differs from "stash push" in that it cannot take pathspecs,
>> > + a
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:19:38AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > - This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'.
> > + This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'. It
> > + differs from "stash push" in that it cannot take pathspecs,
> > + and any non-option argum
Overall the result looks reasonable and get us closer to the ideal
world where nobody recalls "stash save" has ever existed ;-)
Will queue; thanks.
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> Interdiff below:
Thanks. Looks much more polished.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-stash.txt b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> index 89b6a0e672..8be661007d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> @@ -86,7 +86,9 @@ The `--patch
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 06:04:06PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Thanks Peff for the review of the previous rounds.
>
> In addition to addressing the review comments, this round adds another
> patch getting rid of the extra help with an unknown option to git
> stash push.
Yeah, the reasoning i
6 matches
Mail list logo