On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 04:15:42PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> > I don't think it could matter here, as these are meant to be smallish
> > strings, but I think we should get into the habit of using size_t
> > consistently to hold string lengths.
> >
> > It makes auditing for integer overflow pro
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:30:00AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:52:16PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/progress.c b/progress.c
> > index 842db14b72..3149ecd460 100644
> > --- a/progress.c
> > +++ b/progress.c
> > @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static void display(struct p
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:52:16PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> diff --git a/progress.c b/progress.c
> index 842db14b72..3149ecd460 100644
> --- a/progress.c
> +++ b/progress.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static void display(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n,
> const char *done)
> const char *t
3 matches
Mail list logo
