From: "Роман Донченко"
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 6:17 PM
Would that be worth a terse comment in the documentation change part
of the patch?
"Multiple (RFC2047) encodings are not supported.",
or would that be bike shed noise.
I didn't change any documentation... and in either case, the
Philip Oakley писал в своём письме Sun, 07 Dec 2014
20:48:05 +0300:
From: "Роман Донченко"
Jeff King писал в своём письме Sun, 07 Dec 2014
12:18:59 +0300:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 10:36:23PM +0300, Роман Донченко wrote:
One final note on this bit of code: if there are multiple encoded
From: "Роман Донченко"
Jeff King писал в своём письме Sun, 07 Dec 2014
12:18:59 +0300:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 10:36:23PM +0300, Роман Донченко wrote:
The RFC says that they are to be concatenated after decoding (i.e.
the
intervening whitespace is ignored).
Thanks. Both patches look go
Jeff King писал в своём письме Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:18:59
+0300:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 10:36:23PM +0300, Роман Донченко wrote:
The RFC says that they are to be concatenated after decoding (i.e. the
intervening whitespace is ignored).
Thanks. Both patches look good to me, and I'd be happy
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 10:36:23PM +0300, Роман Донченко wrote:
> The RFC says that they are to be concatenated after decoding (i.e. the
> intervening whitespace is ignored).
Thanks. Both patches look good to me, and I'd be happy to have them
applied as-is. I wrote a few comments below, but in al
5 matches
Mail list logo
