Duy Nguyen writes:
>> Probably "Not so ancient versions of Git tries to use ofs-delta
>> encoding whenever possible, so it is expected that objects encoded
>> using ref-delta are minority" may be closer to the truth. And that
>> observation does justify why using two separate pools (one with
>>
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>
>> Notice that with "recent" Git versions, ofs-delta objects are
>> preferred over ref-delta objects and ref-delta objects have no reason
>> to be present in a clone pack.
>
> It is true that we try to use of
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> Notice that with "recent" Git versions, ofs-delta objects are
> preferred over ref-delta objects and ref-delta objects have no reason
> to be present in a clone pack.
It is true that we try to use ofs-delta as much as possible, but
where does "have no reason to be
3 matches
Mail list logo
